By John on July 20, 2010 11:13 AM, Filed Under Random
Let me start by making it abundantly clear that I have a great deal of respect for natural horsemanship--when used properly I have seen it do great things. This article attempts to look back on the last 10 days of the Pat Parelli and Catwalk controversy and explain why I made the video, why that video has 65,000 views, and my thoughts moving forward.
A short history of nearly everything: On Friday, July 9th, Pat Parelli gave a demonstration at the Festival of the Horse in England. During that demonstration he worked with Robert Whitaker's show jumping stallion, Catwalk, who did not want to be bridled. The demonstration did not go as planned and by Saturday the forums were ablaze with first hand accounts of the incident, such as elsbells now infamous quote on the Horse and Hound forum:
"...The room went silent, all viewers went dumb as they watched him use a gum line as a twitch and a 22ft rope wrapped around the fetlock to the knee to haul Catwalks leg off the floor to render him unable to move while he tried to force the bridle onto a now very distressed and frightened horses face!!"
On Friday night the Parelli's tried to quell the controversy with a post on the Parelli blog that acknowledged that Catwalk was challenging and that "a couple of folks were upset at what they think they saw," but the post didn't describe what happened. The story kept growing on the forums and it starting to gain some serious traction by Saturday.
On Sunday, the Parelli's released a heavily edited Youtube video showing a few moments from the Friday demonstration and clips of the horse being bridled on Sunday morning. Despite obviously having the full video from Friday, the Parelli's only included a few seconds of video from the incident and no twitch or leg rope as describe by witnesses on the forums. At this point, I was convinced that at least one person in the audience had cell phone video of the situation and it was just a waiting game to see when the truth about what happened would come out. I also published a post about the situation here on EN Monday afternoon.
Why I made the video: My opinion a week ago and my opinion today is that there are two possible explanations of what happened between Pat Parelli and Catwalk--
Either...
1) The methods Pat used on Catwalk including the twitch and rope around the leg are a legitimate part of the Parelli method.
Or...
2) Pat simply made a mistake and lost his patience with Catwalk
In the first instance, all Pat Parelli needed to do was explain publicly that, what he did to Catwalk is part of the Parelli method. If you really think that twitching a horse and putting a rope around its leg are part of the approved and marketed Parelli method, then fine, but personally, I think the second possibility is much more likely.
If Pat did lose his patience with Catwalk and got more aggressive than he wanted to, he should have acknowledged his mistake, apologized, and moved on. Ultimately, we all get impatient with our horses from time to time and our impatience leads to training mistakes. Heck, I got too impatient with my young horse about 3 times in the warmup at Maryland. Horses are the kindest, most forgiving, animals on the planet and the only way we can honorably work with them is to learn from our mistakes and try to do better the next time. In my opinion, Pat missed an important opportunity to show his vast group of followers that sometimes even the most experienced horsemen screw up and that the most important thing to do is to learn from your mistakes.
I think most people would have forgiven Pat and dropped the issue if he had just explained what happened and apologized. Instead, whether by greed or pride, the Parellis tried to cover the story up with deceptive blog posts and videos. So, it was my turn to get overly aggressive, and I waited for the cell phone footage of Pat fighting the horse to be posted on Youtube and then I combined the clips into one montage video and posted that video last Monday. My video quickly hit the forums, Facebook, and other sites, as of today, it has 65,000 views...
Wait, that's not the right video, here it is...
I never expected the video to spread as quickly as it did, but I had a conversation last month with a friend of mine who makes viral videos and I used some of the techniques that he suggested. The simple fact is that lots of people wanted to know what really happened and the Parellis were not providing a sufficient explanation. There are nearly 700 comments on the video, with both logic and madness on either side of the issue.
On July 16th, Pat posted yet another Youtbe video, this time a copy of a letter he sent to the Festival of the Horse. Pat's letter does not apologize or acknowledge any mistake/wrongdoing with respect to Pat's treatment of Catwalk, but it does apologize for "allowing confusion to evolve" by not explaining what was happening to the audience during the demonstration. The letter goes on to say "we finally achieved success the following day after some more hours of passive persistence. To make sure there was no cause for concern, Catwalk was examined by an independent veterinarian."
Frankly, the 'we got the bridle on the horse eventually, so the techniques were successful' mentality concerns me. One of my favorite aspects of natural horsemanship is that it does not accept that the ends justify the means with respect to training a horse. True natural horsemanship, as I see it, is about finding a way to make the horse want to achieve success rather than just forcing the issue and saying 'voila!'
Ultimately, as I said in my original post, one two hour mistake should not define Pat Parelli as a horseman, and it certainly should not define natural horsemanship as a technique. DO NOT pass judgement on natural horsemanship because of a two minute long Youtube video. Of course, I didn't mean anything personal against Pat or Linda when I posted the video. As they say in politics, 'it's not the crime, it's the coverup' and if someone intentionally tries to deceive our audience then I will do what I can to expose such deception, whether that is a post or a Youtube video that reaches 60,000 people. I still hope that Pat uses this chance to show his fans that acknowledging and learning from our mistakes is the most important part of living a successful life with horses, but I'm not holding my breath. Go eventing.
Very interesting post. I have never tried commercialized NH (I agree with others that what many call good horsemanship, is essentially NH) but have always been intrigued by it. After watching the video (and reading the comment that this went on for two hours) I'm impressed that everybody walked away physically unscathed. Kudos to Catwalk for not acting out more violently. It seems to me that in this instance, where the horse was already traumatized from a previous event, it would have been more beneficial for someone he already knew and trusted to be the one trying to bridle him. I guess this has always been my problem with the stars of NH - it's all about them and the horses are simply a vehicle for stardom.
Whew. What really bothers me is they admit the next day they went back to the horse for more torture! The poor horse! Who has been dealing with lots of horses for a long time and hasn't had a horse who was hard to bridle? I've seen harness racehorses hard to bridle in the paddock where the groom actually climbed up on the horses back and bridled them gently by unbuckling the cheeks and sliding it up. I have seen ignorant young men (grooms in the race paddock) who have every right to be cruel, lose their temper, etc. and be macho with an audience -- and yet do it easily and quickly with the help of an upturned bucket to stand on. I have seen handicapped children saddle and bridle sour old school horses no one could even catch in the stall! Shame on these people. Hilda Gurney has said many times, if violence made a Grand Prix horse, there would be a million of them. Horses know. I feel for Catwalk and I would like to know if the owner of Catwalk is finding him easy to bridle NOW.
The Parelli system is predicated on the idea that you can teach the method to anyone without having to first or concurrently teach the student how to read a horse. This explains why the method doesn't address the issue of the horse planting his ears back and looking irritated or shut down. It also explains why there's no Plan B for the individual horse when the Parelli method attempt fails. You just keep on Parelli-ing.
Bridling a difficult horse is something everyone comes up against at some point in a life with horses. It takes some creative thinking to figure out what will make that particular horse offer to accept the bridle and not just for today. For today, tomorrow and next year. What the Parellis were doing in this video was never going to be more than a sideshow trick even if they had managed to bridle the stallion.
Thanks for making that video, John. I applaud your willingness to jump in feet first.
And the music...What is this, a cocktail party and the entertainment is forcing a horse to be bridled? People need to quit giving the Parellis their money. That will solve the Parelli problem!
I had a young horse one time who was difficult to put a bridle on. I looked in an old horse training book I had and it mentioned putting molasses on the bit. Which I did and the horse was always great after the first time I did it. The only problem was what to do with the quart of molasses I had bought.
Shame, shame ,shame! Shame on Parelli for doing that. Shame on Catwalks owner/trainer/groom for not stopping that. Shame on everyone with half a brain and any heart for not voicing objection to Parelli and/or organizers of event while this went on for 2 hours. SHAME, SHAME, SHAME!
Obviously a very difficult case, probably many different ways to handle it, how long was Pat to be in town? How did the horse get this way? How many handlers previously tried to help this horse? Was the horse fearful or was it a lack of respect? How often had this horse been bridled previously and how was it done? Does it have to be right or wrong? Is the horse in a better place now not having to go through the mental stress of the past? What if nothing had been done? How many horses go through worse treatment in their lifetimes? How many people try to help? How many people devote their entire lives making the world a better place for horses? How many people live perfect lives without mistakes? How many horses forgive humans for crimes worse than this? Horses dont care how much we know till they know how much we care. I for one make mistakes on a daily basis with my horse and I believe he accepts my imperfections and hopes I'm a better communicator tomorrow. I think he believes I can change. : ) We are all on a journey in life and we are where we should be. Catwalk and Pat were destined to meet for whatever reason, regardless of the outcome, I hope they both learned from it and changed for the better. There are many horses who could benefit from this experience in many different ways.
I think that it is wrong to edit out moments in the video which has been done in the youtube vidoe of the page(video taken by the cell phone) if we are to make a judgment it is not by cutting out bits it sdhould all be shown and then we can talk about it! at the ythe moment it looks like the horse was calm but just a bit uncomprehensive in which case it was rong of parelli to have used such methods however if the 800 kg jumping machine jumped on him violently then ther is no questyion that parelli did the right thing as even when trying to do things in a gentle way sometimes dominating a horse is done by violence afterall that is what riding a horse is allabout,yes i agree that the horse should resprct and look up to the rider however i think it is rong to sugest that pat used visious techniques to bridle the horse! it has been said that catwalk is now bridling much better and parellis work has done the world of good!(parrerlli works with horses he does not just show off his skills to the public he trains tham and takes the risk of failing infront of lots of people to show us his method! utherwise he would have just simply got an underwait old horse and showed you how to move over a barrel!
I think that it is wrong to judje him on one demonstration which was more a job than a demonstration as well somtimes if ypu do not want to be killed by 800 kg stallion you have to use a little bit of violence! It has been said that catwalk is not injured in any way and is now better where is the problem!
People have made way to much of a fuss about this and have judjed off false and edited scripta and have lead to lead to think that riding horses is an easy thing with just a carrot and some scoccing a horse will do whatever you want it to!!! Hey remember they are not stupid and i think that it is an embaressement to the humain race as to think this!!
Pain is a method of suductionj and if you look around and think for tywo seconds you will understand!!!! Next time you see an angree father smack his son think of pat and catwalk it is the same thing!!!!!! ~And i dont think that every child ythat has been hit a few times is a traumatized creature! they are just respectfull!!!
When one of the whitakers wins a grand prix with catwalk they can think back and say that it was all down to parelli!
People who try to make the world a better place for horses are not geneouses they have just sat down and tried to understand!!!
For violence go and look in any of the fantastic studs and wards all around the world and then think if ten minutes of hell for catwalk really is worth a 16 year old boy such as my self to have to sit down and write somthing like this!!!!!
Hopefully somoene will read this and maybe i will have helped some people make a decision!
Showmanship and trust issues do not go well together. The arena environment not appropriate for training. Horses often do not take to strangers, and need a week or so to get to know the new handler. I have 35 years exp. with starting young horses. Pat did the old cowboy quick fix and it went badly. I watched the video. These methods are not a good idea for novices, such as the ones that attend Pat's exhibitions.Because of PNH I get a lot of failed do it yourself spoiled horses for retraining. If you buy a horse that is not trained consider hiring a good reputable trainer. Unbroke, horses are dangerous! Apprenticeship is how I learned. I believe it is the best way and safest way!
"Old Cowboy" version is the exact thing I think when I see his demonstrations...I grew up training Quarter Horses around some of the epitomes of old west. Most of the methods I saw were harsh and to the point (...for expediency and profit mind you) , and they were methods I purposly worked to not mimic. I had wondered for awhile what was so "natural" about his (Parelli) program and all I seem to see is knee jerk, old fashioned, forceful methods with a new tool or two. I've had this arguement with some very strong supporters of his method, but for me the bottom line is; We need more of a "relationship" with our horses. I've trained countless horses, in a calmer more gentle manner and been by far happier with the results (problem horses and all)
Anyone who makes it important to own one of his products the basis for training a horse has already made the wrong decision in his mind about how to work with a horse.
Valkyrye
I hope that Pat "Oat" Parelli and Catwalk were brought together for the higher purpose of torpedoing the Parelli pyramid scheme. And whatever did you mean, Shannon, by, "There are many horses who could benefit from this experience in many different ways"? Surely you're not suggesting that there are numbers of horses that would benefit from the treatment poor Catwalk received from Parelli because I can't think of even one.
I have been around horses for 31 years and what was on that video, I feel, was blown out of proportion and I might add, was snippets not the full story and conveniently cut off before he was done. Funny, how he is accused of posting an edited video by someone who posted an edited video. I am not a Parelli student, but he has done a lot of good and kept both horses and riders safer with his methods. That stallion has been fighting this battle and winning for a while. Stallions are very different from mares and geldings, sometimes you have to try something different to break through the wall for the betterment of the animal. Their fight is much stronger and face it, they can kill you. The horse was not hurt and just to make sure was check by a vet. If the owner is happy with the outcome, what right does any one else have to judge.
Welcome to Eventing Nation, your home for the latest Three-Day Eventing news, results, and buzz. As fellow citizens of Eventing Nation, please join our Dressage, Cross-Country, and Show Jumping coverage by participating in our article discussions. At Eventing Nation, we honor the entire equestrian community and especially the horses. Our love for the horse is what brings us all together at Horse Trials and Three-Day Events. Please help grow Eventing Nation by telling your friends and making Eventing Nation your homepage.
Very interesting post. I have never tried commercialized NH (I agree with others that what many call good horsemanship, is essentially NH) but have always been intrigued by it. After watching the video (and reading the comment that this went on for two hours) I'm impressed that everybody walked away physically unscathed. Kudos to Catwalk for not acting out more violently. It seems to me that in this instance, where the horse was already traumatized from a previous event, it would have been more beneficial for someone he already knew and trusted to be the one trying to bridle him. I guess this has always been my problem with the stars of NH - it's all about them and the horses are simply a vehicle for stardom.