Classroom: May 2010 Archives

The Thoroughbred for several reasons:  they have been bred for athleticism, heart, and speed.  In the short format, there are moments when riders jump much faster than they ever did in the Classic format.  Horses with partial TB breeding can find themselves at the end of their capabilities close to the end of a course, while the TB is still galloping within himself.  However, there are downsides to the Thoroughbred, such as temperament and finding a good mover.

Intelligence, athleticism, durability

Broad exposure to activities that rider and horse can engage in.  Riders today do not Foxhunt, go to horse shows and show Green Hunters, or exercise racehorses.  They have a program and stick to it, and that's all they do all the time.

Keep the rhythm.  Dressage, showjumping, cross-country: keep the rhythm.

This should be a two-part question.  For the upper levels, more of the same without rotational falls.  At the lower levels, there is a growing interest in the Classic format.  Upper-level competition has been so professionalized, amateurs know it is beyond their wildest dreams to ride at Rolex.  There will not be many amateurs with one great horse getting to Rolex.  There will be some, but fewer as the sport is professionalized.  The preparation necessary for a three-day makes the Classic format desirable for amateurs.  Two separate career paths are emerging in the sport.

We suited each other.  I purchased him untried.  He arrived late December 1977.  I gave him a couple days off and when I got on it was like putting on a glove.  Throughout his career I never did not understand why he did something.  He was a delight and a pleasure to ride all the time.  He would not be successful these days though, because his dressage was good, but not great, and his showjumping was good, but he would not be as successful at the showjumping heights today. He would have laughed at our cross-country courses these days, because he was so intelligent.

Living a charmed life

I haven't seen the long list yet. Like that line from Casablanca, the USET selectors are going to go out and "round up the usual suspects."  In addition, I hope they will consider some new names for the team...Buck has Pan-Am experience; this is his time, so I hope his horses stay sound.  Every time Boyd Martin comes out, his riding is a little less crude.  He has a very modern attitude towards his lessons and training, meaning that he understands the interrelationship between technique and performance. He is one I've got my eye on.  I am crazy about his riding, but Will Coleman definitely set his chances back with his unfortunate fall at the Fork.  Now he will have to try again at Luhmuhlen.  Jan may not recover from her fall earlier this spring; that is unfortunate, as I thought this was her year.  Will Faudree did himself a world of good with his weekend at Rolex, and the selectors will probably give him a serious look. Kim is our best rider, but Paddy could let us down badly on Sunday. Mara Dean and Alison Springer didn't get it done at Rolex, and I don't know what their plans are next.  Then of course you have the usual suspects- Phillip, Karen, Becky and Amy- to contend with.

Oh, you can believe the Germans and British will wind up at the end, beating each other's brains out.  The French are not good at producing consistent results. Occasionally they put the right four riders together at the right time; you won't feel them coming, and then they beat you like a baby seal.  I'm not as familiar with the newer prospects for Australia and New Zealand, but any team with Andrew Nicholson or Mark Todd as team captain is dangerous.

Bill Steinkraus.  Individual gold medal in Showjumping at the 1968 Olympic Games in Mexico.  He was a rider who combined classical training and riding techniques with competitive drive and desire.  No one wanted to win as much as Bill, but he did it with good training and good riding.

The Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) conducted film analysis of 100 accidents, including 75 cross-country fences and 25 show jumping fences. It was found that the potential for a crushing injury was related to the rotating motion and landing angle of the horse. A landing angle of more than 90 degrees was considered to provide a significant risk of crushing injury to the rider. This happened when the horse hit a fixed obstacle between its knee and elbow. Below this, the horse was able to scrabble over, but above this, the horse stayed behind the fence with the rider staying seated or ejected over the fence. A mathematical model was developed and a full-scale crash test horse was used to simulate the load conditions between a horse and fence. Based on the results of the test program, TRL established that if the rail anchorage was designed to break at a controlled load to ensure that the rail would fall, this would remove the vertical load between the horse and the fence. 

TRL designed a breakable pin with the precise failure strength to allow the rail to drop, thereby stopping the horse from rotating or somersaulting. This means the horse can hit the rail fairly hard without the fence collapsing and still keep its footing, but if the critical load is reached, the pin would fail with the potential of minimizing risk of injury to both horse and rider. The final design and manufacture of the pins has been carried out by Barriers International, Ltd.